This is in spite of government regulations forbidding the use of fire for land
clearing. In short: burning land is illegal! Yet fires are even raging in areas
that have been designated as areas of national importance for environmental
protection, such as the Tripa peatland that lies in the Leuser ecosystem.
Further up the coast, areas are also burning that have been designated for
protection according to the recent Presidential Instruction No. 10/2011: the
so-called moratorium ordering the suspension of issuing new licenses for the
conversion of primary forests and peatland.
These days, it is relatively easy to detect and document serious fires. Since
late 2000, the US Terra and Aqua satellites carrying the MODIS fire detection
sensor, have been detecting and publishing precise coordinates of fires all
over the world. These data are freely available to anyone interested and can be
easily downloaded from the Internet.
Between late 2000 and June 21, 2011, a total of more than 21,600 fires have
been recorded in Aceh and North Sumatra provinces; nearly 42 percent of these
fires were on peatland, despite peatland comprising only 4.8 percent of the
total land area of the two provinces. Thus peatland was 14.4 times more likely
to be burned than non-peatland during this period.
Unfortunately, much damage has already been done, as many of Sumatra’s peatland
has already been converted for plantations. Across the peatland on the east
coast of North Sumatra, near the border with Riau, over 32 percent of all fires
since 2000 occurred in 2005. The incidence of fires there has since declined,
as plantations have already been established. Similarly, much of the coastland
peatland from the southwestern coast of Aceh, all the way down to the border
between North and West Sumatra, was burned between 2004 and 2009.
Although swathes of the Tripa peatland were cleared and burned in the 1990s,
after 2000 most of the peatland along the rest of the west coast of Aceh were
temporarily spared, largely because the separatist conflict in Aceh halted the
activities of the large plantation companies. This changed after the Aceh peace
accord in 2005, and by 2009 burning had accelerated dramatically. Based on the
escalation of fires in the last few weeks, it is clearly continuing, with over
300 fires already recorded this year alone.
Why is the destruction of peatland bad? For hundreds of years, people have not
converted forested areas in coastal peat swamps. The swamps act as huge
sponges, helping to regulate water flows, preventing saltwater intrusion and
stabilizing the coastline, and providing livelihoods for local people through
fishing and the collection of non-timber forest products.
They also store huge amounts of carbon, the drying and burning of which
contributes massively to global climate change. All these valuable long-term
benefits are now being lost in favor of the short-term interests of a
relatively small number of highly influential companies and individuals.
It is debatable whether growing oil palm and other plantation crops is even
sustainable in these peat swamps. It is highly likely that 10 to 20 years from
now, when the peat has subsided below sea level, the top-heavy oil palms have
toppled over, and uncontrollable flooding and seawater intrusion have taken their
toll that these areas will become wasteland, unsuitable for either settlement
or agriculture.
Millions of tons more carbon will have been released into the atmosphere, while
local people will have to move, will be left jobless, and without the natural
resources they had previously enjoyed for
centuries.
Who is to blame? Local reporting of the fires and smoke, as often happens, has
concentrated on describing the locations and dangers of the fires, and the
attempts at trying to extinguish them. There is virtually no discussion of
culpability. The impression is conveyed that this is yet another “natural”
disaster.
But there is nothing even vaguely “natural” about it: it is 100 percent caused
by people. By the Forestry Ministry officials who ignored recommendations by
land-use planners in the 1980s and 1990s that peatland should be preserved, and
instead handed out permits for the peat swamp forests to be converted. By the
large oil palm plantations that dig the canals to drain the swamps, and use fire
to clear the land prior to planting.
By the local and national government officials, and law enforcement agencies,
who have always failed to impose any sanctions on companies that break the law
by using fire, or converting peat that is 3 meters or more in depth (for
instance, many of the peat layers in Tripa are more than 3 meters deep).
By local government officials in Aceh, who in recent years participated in land
grabs and issued local licenses for plantations. Lastly, by all the rest of us,
who have sat by and
allowed this to happen under our very noses.
What can be done about it? Although huge tracts of peatland have already been
damaged beyond repair, along the west coast of Aceh some of the peatland can
still be saved.
All it needs is for the government to enforce its own policies, regulations and
laws. It is easy these days to identify companies that have allowed burning on
their land or are converting peat that is deeper than 3 meters; therefore, it
should be relatively straightforward to revoke their licenses. District
governments, that allow peatland conversion and may even be encouraging it, can
be punished financially by withholding their funding.
The data and analyses that we have used are no secret. Nor are they difficult
to obtain or understand. Unless the central government and the provincial
governments with peatland areas take action now, the stated policy of Indonesia
to protect peatland and reduce its massive carbon emissions, lies in tatters.
Graham Usher is a conservation specialist from the United Kingdom, Gunung Gea
is deputy director of conservation at Yayasan Ekosistem Lestari.
|